One problem with this system is the question of how to allocate electors proportionally. If Kavanaugh was already confirmed by that point, he would become an ongoing, high-profile symbol that Democrats would use to persuade women that the GOP is not the party for them.
Two votes were not cast at all when electors chose to abstain from casting their electoral vote for any candidate. Still, voters might be happier and feel more engaged if they could indicate which candidate they really like vs. He got all sorts of blowback, and almost certainly did himself more harm than good.
The Senate is limited to choosing from the two candidates who received the most electoral votes for vice president. But there are also staunch defenders of the Electoral College who, though perhaps less vocal than its critics, offer very powerful arguments in its favor.
How it works is that instead of just voting for the single candidate you prefer, you make one vote for your first choice, a second vote for your next-best choice, a third vote for the next best choice after that, and so on.
But that is less a product of the Electoral College and more a product of the way states apportion electors. I remember Hubert Humphrey calling for it back in those days. Limiting the number of rankings you vote for to three or four or five simplifies the logistics of counting while probably having only a small effect on the accuracy of the outcome, unless the number of candidates is very large.
There is a serious risk that, if the Democrats take over, no nominee would be approved before This is a very old trick though generally used by comedians, not serious politiciansand is shockingly unsophisticated.
And so, GOP leadership is going to have to decide pretty soon if they want to stick with him, either by voting on him or putting him in a holding pattern, which will make him a major issue in the midterms almost certainly to their detriment.
Conclusion The Electoral College has performed its function for over years and in over 50 presidential elections by ensuring that the President of the United States has both sufficient popular support to govern and that his popular support is sufficiently distributed throughout the country to enable him to govern effectively.
If enough voters act this way, fringe candidates with no true mandate end up getting greatly inflated vote totals and could conceivably even win, a la Putney Swope. This would reduce roundoff error and make the proportional splitting of votes more accurate. I think it could be described in general terms in about the amount of text that the twelfth amendment uses, with the details being left up to congress or the states.
This could make a lot of women, especially college-educated suburban women, become disgusted with the entire Republican Party. Sayre, Wallace Stanley, Voting for President.
V What Happens Next? Instant runoff voting on a national scale has the potential to solve many of the current dilemmas introduced by the Electoral College as well as the problems introduced by some of the other alternatives.
However, that would probably not be as bad as the very severe split vote problem that would occur if you simply awarded the election to whoever got the plurality of a free-for-all. Statistics have shown that more people vote when they know that their vote has a better chance at making a difference.
Although the joint session was suspended, the objections were quickly disposed of and rejected by both Houses of Congress. In fact, there have been several presidential candidates who won the popular vote, but lost the election because they received fewer electoral votes.
And the price is that in very close popular elections, it is possible that the candidate who wins a slight majority of popular votes may not be the one elected president - depending as in on whether his popularity is concentrated in a few States or whether it is more evenly distributed across the States.
In that case, the votes from the State in question are simply ignored. Also noteworthy is that in his senior-class yearbook, Kavanaugh claimed to be a member of the "Keg City Club.
The final winner is almost certain to be the same person that would win a preferential vote. Chile had an electoral college established by the Constitutionwhich was used to elect its president in the elections from to Far from being unusual, this sort of thing has, in fact, happened 15 times including in this century Wilson in both andTruman inKennedy inand Nixon in And the variant of calculating votes by congressional district would make small states be winner-take-all while larger ones are proportional.
Indeed, it is principally because of the Electoral College that presidential nominees are inclined to select vice presidential running mates from a region other than their own.In the Electoral College system, each state gets a certain number of electors based on its total number of representatives in Congress.
Each elector casts one electoral vote following the general election; there are a total of electoral votes.
Track the Senate election with a red/blue map of the US updated daily using the latest state polls. The current system ensures most states are ignored while a few swing states hoard the attention.
An electoral college is a set of electors who are selected to elect a candidate to a particular office. Often these represent different organizations, political parties, or entities, with each organization, political party or entity represented by a particular number of electors or with votes weighted in a particular way.
The system can ignore the wishes of a general membership. Nov 06, · The Electoral College will dominate the airwaves and the headlines on Election Day Tuesday. But what exactly is the Electoral College? Below. Learn about the financing of presidential elections, the rules for convention delegates and the electoral college system used to elect the President of the United States.Download